Fortnite court reveals insights in Epic vs. Google

The Epic v. Google case has been a topic of much debate, with both sides presenting their arguments passionately. While Epic argues for the need to consider real-world implications, Google has its own stand. Let’s delve deeper into the rebuttal presented by Epic’s lead attorney, Gary Bornstein, as he makes a compelling case for examining internal documents to unveil the truth.

The Rebuttal

Epic is getting eight minutes of rebuttal to Google’s closing argument, and lead attorney Gary Bornstein is using part of it to argue this: we should look at the internal documents in this case to see what’s actually going on.

Unveiling the Truth

“What did they say in their documents? That tells you what they believed in the real world.”

He begins by showing one of the emails Google showed us about reacting to an Apple change in price — and that Google chose not to follow that price change at the time.

“They chose not to change their price despite believing that Apple was changing theirs,” he says, and “during that time not a single developer pulled out of the Play Store to focus on iOS.”

Conclusion

As the arguments unfold in the Epic v. Google case, the importance of examining internal documents cannot be understated. By shedding light on what transpires behind closed doors, a clearer picture of the real-world implications emerges.

FAQs

Q: What is the Epic v. Google case about?

A: The Epic v. Google case revolves around allegations of anti-competitive practices and the need to consider real-world evidence.

Q: Why is examining internal documents crucial?

A: Internal documents provide insights into the beliefs and actions of companies, shedding light on their true intentions and practices.

Credit: www.theverge.com