Source: Kent Nishimura / Getty
Historic Appointments vs. Existing Challenges in State Courts
While many have celebrated the historic appointments of Black and other people of color to the federal bench, state and local courts still have a way to go. In several states, judges are directly elected by voters.
The Impact of State Supreme Court Elections
According to Ballotpedia, more than 80 state supreme court seats are up for grabs this election cycle in states like Alabama and Mississippi, along with intermediate appellate court positions. State courts hear more than100 million cases each year, according to the Alliance for Justice.
Approaches for Selecting Judges Depend on the State
Different states use different methods for selecting judges. Some judges are appointed, with voters later voting on whether the judges should be retained.
These retention elections are a simple yes or no on the judges up for review. This is the case in states like Florida. The governor appoints judges and state Supreme Court justices, highlighting the importance of races and the election.
FAQs
Q: What is the significance of state supreme court elections?
A: State supreme courts play a crucial role in interpreting state laws and serving as the court of last resort.
Q: How do different states select judges?
A: States vary in their methods, with some using retention elections and others having judges appointed by the governor.
Q: Why are judicial races challenging for voters?
A: Judicial races can be nonpartisan, making it difficult for voters to choose candidates without clear party affiliations.
Credit: yogossip.com
