Missy Elliott to Face Copyright Trial

Published:

Missy Elliott Facing Copyright Trial for Alleged Co-Written Tracks in the ’90s

Background

A federal judge has ordered Missy Elliott to face a copyright trial following accusations that she co-wrote multiple tracks in the ’90s with a man who claims he was never credited for his contributions. The case was brought forward by Terry Williams, and Judge Nitza I. Quiñones Alejandro has decided not to dismiss it, with the exception of one song, ‘Heartbroken’ by Aaliyah.

sajdhasd

Legal Dispute

Williams alleges that he collaborated with Elliott between 1993 and 1996, co-writing four tracks released by Elliott’s R&B group, Sista. However, Elliott’s legal team argues that she did not work with Williams until after the songs were already produced. The songs in question are featured on Sista’s 1994 album, ‘4 All the Sistas Around Da World.’

In response to these claims, Williams maintains that he worked closely with Elliott during the specified period and was unjustly denied credit for his contributions.

Judge’s Ruling

Judge Alejandro has stated that there is a genuine dispute regarding whether Williams and Elliott collaborated during the production of the album in question. The judge also dismissed Williams’ claim regarding ‘Heartbroken’ by Aaliyah, citing the extended timeframe between the song’s release and Williams’ legal action.

Upcoming Trial

The case is now set to go to trial, with a jury tasked to determine the outcome of the dispute between Williams and Elliott.

Conclusion

Despite the legal complexities surrounding the allegations of co-writing and credit, the trial will provide a platform for both parties to present their evidence and arguments.

FAQs

Q: What are the main allegations against Missy Elliott in the copyright trial?

A: The main allegations include claims of co-writing multiple songs with a man in the ’90s who was not credited for his contributions.

Q: Why was one song, ‘Heartbroken’ by Aaliyah, dismissed from the legal dispute?

A: The judge ruled that the statute of limitations had expired due to the lengthy delay in legal action regarding this specific song.


Credit: mixmag.net

Related articles

You May Also Like